Review of Intellectual Property Law Blog

The Latest from RIPL: Issue 2 of Vol. 17 has been published

By Staff on Friday, December 22nd, 2017
0 Flares 0 Flares ×

Dear Subscribers,

The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law is proud to announce the publication of Issue 2 of Volume 17!  We are pleased to feature articles by Ted L. Field, Sue Ann Ganske, Alan J. Gocha, Seemantani Sharma, and Jesse Syner covering a wide range of topics: from advice on writing like a patent litigator, an examination of the latest series of high- profile patent case in 2016-2017, a clarification of Alice Corp v. CLS Bank Int’l on determining section 101, an examination of Traditional Knowledge Digital Knowledge and its role in the war against biopiracy, to what is proper venue in patent cases in light of TC Heartland v. Kraft. Also included are student comments by Elise Ruff, and Kaylee Willis examining the effects of uniform copyright design test on local fashion designers and the challenges marijuana based patents face in the new frontier of its use.

Articles
Write Like a Patent Litigator: Avoid Common Mistakes by Non-Patent Lawyers, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 141 (2017)
Ted L. Field

Samsung v. Apple, Life Technologies v. Promega, SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, TC Heartland v. Kraft, Impression Products v. Lexmark, and Sandoz v. Amgen; The U.S. Supreme Court Decides Six Patent Cases in 2016-2017, 17. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 162 (2017)
Sue Ann Ganske

Avoiding the Rabbit Hole: An Ontological Model for Determining Section 101 Patent-Eligibility under Alice, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 192 (2017)
Alan J. Gocha

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library: “A Silver Bullet” in the War against Biopiracy?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 214 (2017)
Seemantani Sharma

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands and the Big Debate About East Texas: How a Delaware Case Leaves Patent Venue Unsettled and Presages as Applied Challenges to the Constitutionality of Narrow Venue Interpretations, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2017)
Jesse Snyder

Comments

If the Shoe Fits: The Effect of a Uniform Copyright Design Test on Local Fashion Designer, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 262 (2017)
Elise Ruff

Avoiding the Chaos of Maryjane- A Conventional Approach to Intellectual Property Protection of Marijuana, 17. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 278 (2017)
Kaylee Willis 

 

 

Best,

The 2017-2018 Editorial Board
John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law

0 Flares Facebook 0 Twitter 0 0 Flares ×

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *