Review of Intellectual Property Law Blog

The Latest from RIPL: Issue 3 of Vol. 17 has been published

By Staff on Tuesday, March 13th, 2018
0 Flares 0 Flares ×

Dear Subscribers,

The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law is proud to announce the publication of Issue 3 of Volume 17!  We are pleased to feature articles by Donald Dunner, Scott Locke, and Ashish Bharadwaj covering a wide range of topics: from examining the role of the Supreme Court in the Federal Circuit’s patent mission, the trademark disclaimer provision of the Lanham Act, to analyzing the contentious issue of injunctive relief as a remedy for infringement of standard essential patents under FRAND licensing terms. Also included is a student comment by Danielle Mobley proposing that the subconscious copying doctrine needs to be extended to political speech. Lastly, a compilation of interviews with several participating judges in the Northern District of Illinois’ Patent Pilot Program conducted by the RIPL Vol. 17 Executive Board.

Articles

The Supreme Court: A Help or a Hindrance to the Federal Circuit’s Mission?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 298 (2018)
Donald Dunner

The Trademark Disclaimer Provision of the Lanham Act: Is USPTO Flexibility Worth Litigant Ambiguity?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 305 (2018)
Scott Locke

Failure is Not Falling Down But Refusing to Get Up: Implication of Huawei/ZTE Framework (CJEU 2015) in Europe, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 326 (2018)
Ashish Bharadwaj

 

Comments

Deja Vu or Copyright Infringement? Why Melania Trump Infringed on Michelle Obama’s Copyrighted Speech Through Subconscious Copying, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 360 (2018)
Danielle Mobley

Patent Pilot Program Perspectives: Patent Litigation in the Northern District of Illinois, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 348 (2018)
RIPL Vol. 17 Executive Board

0 Flares Facebook 0 Twitter 0 0 Flares ×

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *